Redirecting to original paper in 30 seconds...
Click below to go immediately or wait for automatic redirect
📄 Abstract
Abstract: Accurate crop-type classification from satellite time series is essential for
agricultural monitoring. While various machine learning algorithms have been
developed to enhance performance on data-scarce tasks, their evaluation often
lacks real-world scenarios. Consequently, their efficacy in challenging
practical applications has not yet been profoundly assessed. To facilitate
future research in this domain, we present the first comprehensive benchmark
for evaluating supervised and SSL methods for crop-type classification under
real-world conditions. This benchmark study relies on the EuroCropsML
time-series dataset, which combines farmer-reported crop data with Sentinel-2
satellite observations from Estonia, Latvia, and Portugal. Our findings
indicate that MAML-based meta-learning algorithms achieve slightly higher
accuracy compared to supervised transfer learning and SSL methods. However,
compared to simpler transfer learning, the improvement of meta-learning comes
at the cost of increased computational demands and training time. Moreover,
supervised methods benefit most when pre-trained and fine-tuned on
geographically close regions. In addition, while SSL generally lags behind
meta-learning, it demonstrates advantages over training from scratch,
particularly in capturing fine-grained features essential for real-world
crop-type classification, and also surpasses standard transfer learning. This
highlights its practical value when labeled pre-training crop data is scarce.
Our insights underscore the trade-offs between accuracy and computational
demand in selecting supervised machine learning methods for real-world
crop-type classification tasks and highlight the difficulties of knowledge
transfer across diverse geographic regions. Furthermore, they demonstrate the
practical value of SSL approaches when labeled pre-training crop data is
scarce.