Redirecting to original paper in 30 seconds...
Click below to go immediately or wait for automatic redirect
📄 Abstract
Abstract: Automating the co-design of a robot's morphology and control is a
long-standing challenge due to the vast design space and the tight coupling
between body and behavior. We introduce Debate2Create (D2C), a framework in
which large language model (LLM) agents engage in a structured dialectical
debate to jointly optimize a robot's design and its reward function. In each
round, a design agent proposes targeted morphological modifications, and a
control agent devises a reward function tailored to exploit the new design. A
panel of pluralistic judges then evaluates the design-control pair in
simulation and provides feedback that guides the next round of debate. Through
iterative debates, the agents progressively refine their proposals, producing
increasingly effective robot designs. Notably, D2C yields diverse and
specialized morphologies despite no explicit diversity objective. On a
quadruped locomotion benchmark, D2C discovers designs that travel 73% farther
than the default, demonstrating that structured LLM-based debate can serve as a
powerful mechanism for emergent robot co-design. Our results suggest that
multi-agent debate, when coupled with physics-grounded feedback, is a promising
new paradigm for automated robot design.
Submitted
October 29, 2025
Key Contributions
Introduces Debate2Create (D2C), a framework where LLM agents engage in a dialectical debate to jointly optimize a robot's morphology and control policy. This iterative process progressively refines proposals, yielding effective and diverse robot designs, demonstrated on a quadruped locomotion benchmark.
Business Value
Accelerates the development of novel and high-performing robots by automating complex design and control optimization processes, leading to more capable and specialized robotic systems.